Police History Essay

Starting In 1829, Sir Robert ransack began developing his possible action of policing. These nine principles be as relevant today as they were in the 1800s. sputter established the Metropolitan natural practice of law when he served as base of operations Secretary of England. Since Sir Robert Peel introduced his principles of policing in the early 1800s, our country has continued to see his ideas of utile policing. Community policing is based on Peels invention of measure.According to one of Peels principals, the real key for policing is The natural jurisprudence argon the battalion and the people are the legal philosophy. Peel believed that prevention of hatred could be accomplished without intruding into the lives of citizens. Sir Robert Peels outset principle was that, The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and dis determine (Westminster constabulary Department, 2012) In our diverse society, it is necessary for police to figure the diff erent cultures that make up the communities that they patrol.If police substructure relate to and gain the different cultures of the companionship, they will be able to successfully gain national approval. I believe this is important for his second two principals. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon worldly concern approval of police actions. Also, Police moldiness secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observance of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public. (Westminster Police Department, 2012) Peel also felt strongly about the idea of the commit of force as well.In two other principals Peel express The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the drug ab intention of physical force and that Police use physical force to the termination necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion , advice, and warning is found to be insufficient. (Westminster Police Department, 2012) spendthrift force has been a public concern and the first sign of community mis effrontery in the police. It can take years to gain the rely of a community and one incident to lose that trust.By providing comme il faut training on the use of force and having the publics trust and respect can ensure that force is only used to the completion necessary. When individuals keep up little or no respect towards the police, they are virtually likely to ignore the requests or demands of officers. This can lead to the officer having to use force in order to gain control of a situation. Peel felt that The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it. (Westminster Police Department, 2012) When police are faced with dispersing large crowds, it is necessary for the public to have the respect to follow police orders.When indi viduals lack trust and respect for the police, riots whitethorn occur, which can also lead to arrests, serious injuries, and even death. Sir Robert Peels principles and Community Policing go hand in hand and share the resembling concepts and goals in policing. One of the distinct similarities between Peels go on and Community Policing is that prevention of crimes is the number one priority. I believe that Peel felt morals played an important role in effective policing.It is important that police officers hypothesise things through and have the best interests in mind before making decisions. Peels principals Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial religious service to the law, and Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary (Westminster Police Department, 2012) Are important and should be demonstrated to earn the trust of the people in the long unknot and to uphold the law. The relationship between the U. S. overnment and police organizations across the United States can be analyzed in some(prenominal) ways.I believe that because the police organizations and the organization have a close relationship in several ways. Not only are police organizations expected to follow rules from their give departments, they also must follow standard federal guidelines as well. at that place are federal, state and, local levels of police organizations. The federal government roles are similar to that of local and state however there are a few differences. The FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) and the Department of Homeland Security are examples.Employees of these organizations are by law, allowed to make an arrest in any county or state. dissimilar local or state police organizations, these officers do not get out basic protection services or simple criminal investigations unless the local or st ate agency cannot control the situation (say for example a serial killer). There are some problems with the way our government controls reliable things with the other agencies. For example our government ran U. S. military is being used for national law enforcement. Also, the federal government is taking over the training, financing and commission of local police.This could cause many issues, removing the police from local control may not be the smartest move. The concern is arising that the federalized police have increasingly dour to violent tactics and assaults on people who have not committed any crimes. When issues like this arise, it can cause problems within local or state organizations when it comes to police procedures and the way policing is being done. If the organizations dont finger as though they are in control, or that their problems or concerns are not being addressed properly, this may affect the quality of law enforcement.It could also cause communication iss ues and lapses. There is the other possibility, that some people may have the opinion that things are better with more distant control. Policing may have to change in many ways to reconcile to the change in control. Conclusion In conclusion I think there can be both pros and cons to the relationship between the U. S. government and the police organizations. I also believe that Sir Robert Peel had a study effect on the policing of his time, our current police procedures, and community policing.