Answering questions

2-A. youthfully, a comedian on a television set show remarked that he thought it was funny that mountain turn the car radio set off when they are looking for a house sum up in a strange neighborhood. What theory of anxiety is this comedian adhering to?The comedian based his remarks on the theory of divided upkeep. This theory states that attention elicit be divided into two separate states, wherein unitary can come across to two things or stimuli at the same time, without sacrificing the quality of attention precondition to either of the two stimuli (Reisberg, 2001). Thus to the comedian, one can continue au dashnce to the radio and at the same time look for the house number, and it short makes sense to him that a person can do both of it since it does not really require an intense concentration.However, a case in head is that looking for a house number in a massive row of houses may be quite a challenging task, one that requires concentration and selective attention. Yes, it can be said that keeping the radio on would not make any difference just to those who prefer to look closely and to be adapted to do so safely would innately turn their radios off. Just imagine yourself driving slowly in a street you are unfamiliar with and keeping the radio on would mask the noise of incoming traffic or even off pedestrians.Besides, when a person is involved in one task, like looking for a house, then one instinctively attends to it and disregards the other sounds, sights and disturbances in the immediate environment. carve up attention is very real, we engage it once in a sequence especially if we multi-task but we could do so in a express period, for example recollect of how you can possibly manage to entertain questions from an officemate at your table and at the same time talk to someone on the recall, you could do both for a maximum of 2 minutes, but last one stimuli takes greater attention and we must give our full attention to it.On the ot her hand, with training, anybody can make use of divided attention, but its contributions and benefits in engaging in it remains to be computen since practically explore has to be done in this area.2-B. Based on what you induce well-read about perception and attention, do you take its safefor people to talk on cellular hollers while they are driving? instruction about how we perceive the world around us gives us a better way of understanding how intricate the human assessment is and how even a faculty that we often take for granted can have a profound impact in our free-and-easy lives. Perception refers to a complex process of how we receive a stimuli, how our brain process the stimuli, and how our mind tells us what to do and how to react to the stimuli (Reisberg, 2001).It can be said that a disruption of any of the lines of our perception may have adverse consequences sometimes it can be bizarre, like when a person cannot recognize the formulation of love one but instea d are able to range that they look like a family member. Taking our study of perception into our daily activities, a debated issue like is it safe to talk on the cell phone while driving is better explained.I still confide that it is not safe to talk on the cellular phones while driving. driveway already entails a number of processes and is quite demanding of our attention, like when you are in the freeway, one has to be conscious of incoming traffic, cars at you back, the speed plant of the highway, and even looking out for possible mishaps in the road, on circus tent of which, the driver must be conscious of the cars fuel level, brake unstable and tire conditions. So how could anybody be able to talk on the phone while driving?Talking on the phone excessively demands attention we have to perceive and process what the other person is saying, and to even think of the appropriate response to what they are saying. Theories on perception have express that our mind works overtim e just to process and be able to respond to external stimuli, and that each part of the brain is involve in different ways just to come up with the correct bear upon of information (Reisberg, 2001), like being able to recognize faces of family members.perceptual illusions institute that what we see may not be true or real, thusly while driving we may not be able to accurately tell how far we are from the car ahead of us or how near we are to the railings without our full concentration. Reports have shown that many people die on the road or in car accidents than any disease. Perceptual overload occurs when we drive and talk on the phone, based on prior researches (Reisberg, 2001), perceptual overload makes us incorrectly perceive our surroundings and and so we may see what is not there, or we may not see what is really there.When we overload our senses it would mean that one part of the brain or our faculties power be sacrificed to compensate for the attention we give to another stimulus. And in an activity like driving which in itself is a high-risk behavior, we bring complete control of our faculties, thus talking on the cell phone is not advisable.2-C. Write a 200 word summary and diminutive analysis on Rayners article. Discuss what the article is basically about, its heavy and weak points, how convincing (or unconvincing) you find its arguments, and how it might be followed up (e.g., if you think the article suggests any promising, new ideas for future research, describe what they are and how they might best be pursued.)The article Eye Movements in Reading Recent Developments by Keith Rayner (1993) presents the latest development in the study of spunk relocation in the reading process. The strength of the article is that it gives a background of what has been discovered so far in the field of study, the article argues that study eye movement is important for it help build theory and also use to infer perceptual and cognitive processes during read ing thus the objective of the article. It also presents a number of theories that have used new methods in studying eye movement.What was weak about the article was that it was not able to bring together how the new methods of studying would contrite to a better understanding of the cognitive processes that occur during reading. The article basically was not convincing when the author says that much remains to be seen when researchers realize how sakeing a research entropy eye movement can be. The article does not arouse this interest and simply goes on to say that eye movement is a natural consequence of reading, which contradicts his claims earlier in the introduction part. The article was also as well as technical for the average reader even if the reader is interested in eye movement.ReferencesRayner, K. (1993). Eye movements in reading Recent developments. Current Directions inPsychological Science, 2 (3) 81-85Reisberg, D. (2001). Cognition Exploring the science of the Mind, 2nd ed. New York W.W.Norton & Company, Inc.