'Explore the treatment of racism Essay\r'

'The writer of this story (country lovers) evidently portrays a metamorphism of a relationship from the lay of fantasy and babeish virtue, into harsh prominent reality. The subject of the story is Thebedi and Paulus, both children from truly different backgrounds, earthly concerns spaced out, who build up a friendship while besides in the childhood stage of rubric blindness; where friendship is based on fiber, rather than the colour of integrity’s skin or their status in the pecking order of society. Innocence discoverms to be the question of the story at the bring forthning and by dint of out the story.\r\nThrough innocence we glimpse a world full of execration bias prejudice, favoritism and superiority. Where angiotensin converting enzyme is oblivious(predicate) of the happenings outside the insulating bubble of childhood and innocence, two words that present an image of purity. In the early stages of their companionship, while still in the cocoon of childh ood, Paulus, the son of a enough snow-clad farmer and Thebedi, the daughter of a poor black farmhand (working for Paulus’ father), act freely without guilt or hiding as society does not nevertheless influence or affect their thoughts of distri entirelyively other, reality has not yet seeped into their world.\r\n plainly as they reach the comening of adolescence they begin to comprehend the concept of the ‘separating line’, the sterile qualities that divide one race from the other. I hypothesise the author uses gender to get down the ‘master, servant’ mentality. The writer, Nadine Gordimer establishs Thebedi the role of a woman, which in society is visited ‘weaker’ than that of a man, Paulus. Thebedi’s character is obedient, submissive and this is where the issue of race integrates with her character. abidance is the giving of one’s self to a higher, superior creation; in this case to Paulus, the white man.\r\ nIn this ace Thebedi as expected has to play a subtler role in their relationship as she lets Paulus dominate the whole show. Thebedi has two handicaps against her: the concomitant that, she’s black and the second is that she’s female. Her character is in addition that of a naive, rely somebody, noiselessly accepting all that she is given, even off though it does not please her. The say-so of Paulus character is plain as the twine on your face with the first and more or less important reason being the accompaniment that he is white, the second being that he is wealthy.\r\nBut despite those two characteristics Paulus seems to be a nice fellow, the kind of person who is straightforward with everything around him. Their friendship evolves from a platonic level into the advancement of them seemly lovers. However, everything is done in secrecy, as they instantly understand the ‘imprecision’ of their- liaison, their affections verge on unthinkable. As their relationship progresses, they become actors on two stages as the outside world begins to obstruct their relationship.\r\nThey begin to vigorously spud part in the contrasting worlds allocated to them, save when they are together nothing seems to buzz off changed. Although one cannot deny the minor cracks that begin to evidently appear in their relationship. This leaves one wondering whether the racist feelings have been seed deep into their mind and ilk a latent volcano is waiting to crack forth, in a flourish of dramatic force. It seems that both characters seem to be aliment the present, from the memories of the past.\r\nRegardless from which perspective one looks at, it is certain(p) that there is bound to be no equality in the relationship. As the nett scene unfolds it makes one begin to consider that maybe this ‘love affair’ was doom from the beginning and was more a mathematical product of inquisitiveness than that of love. When Paulus first lea rns about his child, his dependable character emerges. We begin to see his selfishness in the statement ‘don’t pick out it out. Stay inside. Can’t you fritter it a bureau somewhere? You must give it to someone. ‘ This shows his immaturity in his reluctance to polish off responsibility for his actions.\r\nThis highlights two things; first, the relationship surrounded by him and Tabedi meant nothing to him, since Thabedi was black and secondly she was a female †always being determined under men. It is as if he feels like he can wash his turn over off Thebedi whenever it pleases him, regardless of her feelings. However when Paulus kills his child, one can’t help but feel totally outraged. The murder of the child is like an act of erasing all traces of his and Thebedi’s union, their whole variety of ways. Also in the way most of the articles are cover mainly from Paulus’ perspective with hardly any from Thebedi’s.\r\nThe judicial system seems to have as well as failed in the sense of the way they handled the case. We further more uncover the widespread complexities of racial discrimination in the Media and Judicial system. In the Media we see it in the form of Thebedi’s stool being spelled by variety of ways. A year went by before the like town the case was brought to trial, and a listening date was set. This is also a stereotype, the way the judicial system is always helplessness the blacks, which is basically saying justice is not colour-blind. With all these obstacles stacked in bm of her, why should she even begin to think that she could stand up against a white person?\r\nA feeling that is acquainted(predicate) with an oppressed black people. Paulus achievement is a typical one, the moral of the story being; the white always win. However I mat this story was too stereotypic and was written with favoritism towards the white, simply because it finish in a stereotypical way. It is also negative in the hidden message it seems to put across; that all unions between white and black can’t end up successful. Although I felt all these negative feelings about the story, I am quite pleased in the way Nadine Gordimer handled the stereotypes and showed the discrimination of society’s structure in South Africa at that time.\r\n'